Monday 21 February 2011

Assignment 2


Assignment 2 of the second semester saw us looking at the term “Polysemy” and Roland Barthes “The Rhetoric Of The Image”.

“Polysemy” refers to a word with two or more similar meanings.  For example,
The man stood is at the foot of the mountain.
He bent over to tie his shoe on his left foot.
In the first sentence, “foot” refers to the area around the bottom of a mountain. In the second sentence the same word refers to the body.

By the same token, in the context of an image or photograph, “polysemy” simply means to derive meaning from.

When presented with exactly the same image, two people could get two very different meanings.

Take a look at the three images below. What story do they tell you?







When I first looked at the three pictures I decided that they suggested a broken relationship, which was beyond repair  (the dry, cracked ground). I thought perhaps one party had left (the car facing away from the viewer) and that over time the other party had become depressed and turned to alcoholism (the bottles sitting next to the clock).

An example of how different people relate to different images in very different ways is shown here when I asked a 21 year old female from Edinburgh, studying Psychology to look at the images.

“Two people were stuck in a desert because they ran out of petrol. They had no food or water for days and began to loose hope. When eventually someone came to their rescue they celebrated by going to the pub.”

After repeating the experiment on multiple people, it became apparent that something was changing the outcome each time. If the images were not the variable, could it be that each person’s individual background, knowledge and experiences influenced how they interpreted these images? This idea posed many questions. What other factors could colour people’s perception? Mood? Social group?

“The Rhetoric of the Image” by Roland Barthes supports this idea. Barthes suggests that messages people take from images can be grouped into three different types.

1.     The non-encoded iconic or Clear meaning – Common understanding that is apparent to everyone.
2.     The coded iconic or Symbolic meaning – Understanding from relating an image with personal cultural knowledge.

3.     The linguistic or Textual meaning. – Understanding of image after reading included text.

It’s number two, The Coded Iconic, which shows how each person interoperates each image in a unique way. For example, you may relate the images to a subject you studied at university. Someone studying Interior and Environmental Design may look at these images and focus on the colours used and incorporate this in their story.

The Linguistic, number three, suggests that text can be used to change the meaning people derive from any given image.

To show this I added the word “love” to one of my images and repeated the experiment again asking a different group of people.

This time, 19 year old Chris from Fife who works at Debenhams said…

“A lone wanderer travels the rustic roads of the south, dreaming of his college sweetheart when distracted he crashes deep within the forest. For days he was alone and stranded. Isolation made him crazy and when he eventually returns home he turns to alcoholism to numb his pane.”

The addition of the word love has evidently encouraged the theme of romance, in this case it provided a reason for the man to crash and suggests his loneliness.

A simple word can completely change the meaning of an image and could be used to lead views down a specific path. Barthes example given in his paper shows how this relationship between text and image can be a powerful tool in advertising. Perhaps we are under a greater influence into what we buy or where we eat than we realise!


As we worked in groups to collect evidence we accumulated a few stories. Here’s a look at some of the other responses:

Kirsty
20 years of age
works at call center

Shown: car, bottles, mud with the word Love.

“These pictures symbolic the idea of loving the earth, for example, to banish pollutants from cars and stop littering.”



George
(Student) chemical engineer

Shown: Cracked mud, Car, Bottles

“The scenario is a person who drink drives and as a result, dies.”



Laura
Student (studying English)
18 years old

Shown - cracked ground, car, bottles.

“There was a drought. 2 people travel by car to help by taking water to the people affected.”



Sandra
40+
Manager

Shown - bottles, cracked ground, car.

“There is conflict between a couple. The cracks in the foundation of their relationship are too deep and one of them leaves.”



Images:

Thursday 3 February 2011

1D: The Johari Window

After completing this assignment we were asked to look up "The Johari Window" and comment on how it explains our our reaction to our partners perceptions of our personality. 

Created in 1955 by Joseph Luft and Harry Ingham, A Johari Window is a reflective tool used to help people understand their communication and relationships with others.

The person is given a list of 56 adjectives and encouraged to pick five or six that they feel describe their own personality best. Friends or colleagues of the person are then given the same list, and each picks five or six adjectives that they feel best describe that person. These adjectives are then placed strategically onto a grid by each person.

The grid is also known as The Johari House with four rooms. Room 1 is the part of us that is known to ourselves and others. Room 2 is the aspects that are known to others but not ourselves. Room 3 is the part of us which is seen by neither ourselves or by others. Room 4 is our private space, which we know about but choose to keep from others.


Below is an example table using all the 56 adjectives which I have placed in a rough order to suit myself.




 



After asking friends if there was anything they knew about me which I had marked down as "unknown to others", the window showed that there are aspects of my personality which I did not think were visible to others, when in fact they were. Adjectives which I would class as "known to me" but not "known to others" are often known to others through their perception of clues subconsciously given away through what I own, wear, go etc. This supports the idea that your 'stuff' really can say a lot about you!

Reactions To 1B and 1C.

So here’s what my partner thought of my perceptions of her:

“Spot on! Although I've actually never been told that I'm really girly before, I guess I do like my room to be 'cute' and homely, but I don't think my personality is obviously girly. I live with 3 other girls and I'm from Glasgow so I do live away from home”

It just goes to show you can tell a lot about a person from their possessions and how they inhabit their personal space!

I have to say, my partner did a very good job of analysing my room. I would agree with everything she said about my habits and personality. The only mistake she made was assuming I lived with my parents when in fact I live in a flat with three other female students.

Below are pictures I sent to my partner and what conclusions she drew from them!


 



 

 










"I'm thinking you live at home with your parents cause there's no skint student vibe about your room? haha, the furniture is really nice and new. Pretty homely looking, unless you've got a beast of a flat in Dundee.

Your bedroom was really clean and tidy! duvet proper tucked in, pillows placed and not just flung down. I think maybe you're a really organised person, that you like to have everything planned and feel in control of things..from the decor/bed clothes/ballet shoes/book on fashion I get the vibe you like your girly things?

The desk was really neat and in order too, I get the impression you're really into what you do at school, always make deadlines, get stuck into the work and enjoy it? 

You're into the old school Disney films and your little Henry and Hetty hoovers give me the vibe you're quite a bubbly person/doesn't take things too seriously...

You've got quite a Twilight collection, are you into vampires? haha. So you're probably in love with Edward Cullen, me too!

Friends boxset and quizzz, you've probably got a pretty good sense of humour! chipmonkss/meerkat teddy/mini hoovers..a quirky, fun, you enjoy a laugh and probably a good bev am I right?


It’s a rather strange feeling having someone that you don’t know pick through your stuff looking for clues as to what kind of person you may be!

Wednesday 2 February 2011

Assignments 1B and 1C of the new semester!

For this assignment we had to apply Sam Gosling’s Snoop Theory to a partner’s belongings and decide what we believed their personality, tastes and influences were.



From what I can gather my partner lives away from home to with possibly one or two other girls? No boyish vibes about the flat!

The pink colour scheme and floral bunting in her room would suggest she is a very 'girly girl'?

I'm guessing that she is not a messy person but definitely not as fanatic as I am about organization. A couple of things were lying around her room and the bottom of her wardrobe seemed to be a place to put anything which didn’t have a specific home of it’s own. Quite a relaxed, laid back person? I did notice however that her shoes were very organised in the wardrobe so I'm guessing she takes pride in them and loves shoes? I liked how they were paired and all facing the front! A lot of thought put into how they are displayed. Also the Topshop shoebox on a shelf elsewhere in her room suggests shoes are something she is prepared to spend money on.

She appeared to be a very sentimental person, keeping concert tickets, photographs with friends and some photographs from her childhood. From her pictures with her friends I assumed she is a fun and outgoing person as she is smiling and laughing in most of them. This suggests she is the type of person who is always up for a laugh. Perhaps the odd drink with friends judging by the Jagermeister bottle she kept as a memento.

From various images on her wall I could tell she was interested in photography and graphics, maybe a bit of collage? Definitely arty. Lots of colour!

Robert Pattinson fan judging by the poster and supported by the Twilight book and film!

Could Bambi be her favourite Disney film? There were a couple of images on her wall.

From the nail varnish and tweezers I'm guessing she takes pride in her appearance? Make-up bag and various hair products would suggest this too.

By displaying personal belongings, for example on her windowsill, she perhaps likes to customise her space and make it her own? Photos and images on the walls suggest she likes to make things homely.

A watch similar to the style of products sold at shops such as Urban Outfitters suggests she have a keen interest in fashion? In particular is she influenced by reto styles? The watch is a traditional Casio model.

Again, candles, doll, My Little Ponies and ice-cream cones also suggest she is a very feminine girl. The ponies give the impression she does not shy away from her youth.

Her DVD collection appears to be quite small suggesting she would rather have a night out than a night in? Also the majority of DVD's are comedy. This may be something she enjoys.

I picked up on a diverse taste in music. Not a specific taste as she has a Jay-Z poster, and in contrast, a ticket from a Frightened Rabbit concert.





I wonder what I got right…